![fat female body with back copy space fat female body with back copy space](https://ak.picdn.net/shutterstock/videos/24023689/thumb/1.jpg)
Not so fast say consumer advocates, who have found support from cabin crew groups whose members have to squeeze their way around and manage the fall-out. Airlines can cram in as many seats they want in an airplane as long as passengers can evacuate in an emergency within 90 seconds, and airline honchos say that standard is being comfortably met.
![fat female body with back copy space fat female body with back copy space](https://thumbs.dreamstime.com/z/overweight-fat-woman-isolated-white-background-studio-weight-losing-obesity-cellulite-health-care-concept-copy-space-168181690.jpg)
Loosely regulated currently, the main protocol that drives body space issues today is safety. People also take more “stuff” on board, including heavier carry-on luggage, to avoid checked-in baggage fees – another source of revenue for airlines.Īll this has spurred some consumer advocates to agitate for regulations to mandate adequate space. The average American woman has gained about 16 pounds and increased her waist size by more than 3 inches. Apparently, since the late 1980s, the average American man over age 20 has gained about 15 pounds and his waist size has increased by more than 2 inches. Meanwhile, studies have shown that people, particularly in America, are getting bigger, larger, wider, and heavier. The pitch in many budget airlines has dropped to below 30 inches (as low as 28 on some) and the seat width to below 18 inches – 17 inches in some cases. Go back half a century or so and you will find seats in airplanes were as wide as 22-24 inches with legroom or “pitch” – the distance between the back of one seat and the back of the next – of up to 35 inches. The big elephant in the room that few airlines talk about is the shrinking of seat sizes and leg space to accommodate more in an airplane. Much of the glamor has dissipated for pilots and flight crew and the lolly does not match the allure. Have you noticed by the way that often the person who checks you in at the front counter also circles around to board you at the aerobridge? Apparently, it is taking fewer and fewer people to get an airplane off the ground today than it did say 25-30 years ago because airline personnel are called to do more - for less. Airplanes are lighter and more efficient, and some airlines are even more disciplined. Outside of the mysterious algorithms that drive pricing that only airline insiders know, greater efficiencies are often attributed to explain low costs. In fact, you can get an off-season round ticket for as low as $800 although peak holiday fares can go up to $2,500. Fast forward 30 years and it's not very different.
![fat female body with back copy space fat female body with back copy space](https://image.shutterstock.com/image-photo/body-middle-aged-rotund-woman-600w-391639156.jpg)
For instance, it cost approximately $1,000 for a US-India economy round ticket back in the 1990s. Airlines are now making up for lost time and revenue with a slightly more rational approach, although fuel cost and "revenge travel" spurred by receding Covid fears are among immediate reasons being cited for the high prices.įor the longest time though, it was an enduring mystery how airlines managed to keep fares low, or at the same level, across decades. Although the airlines that offered the low fare sank without a trace, it was instructive for others to wise up. Gone are the days where one could fly coast-to-coast for less than the cab fare from home to airport, as happened once to your columnist, who paid $69 for a one-way Washington DC to Seattle ticket (cab fare home was $70). This is particularly true in the US market where tickets on some domestic routes cost more than flying halfway across the world. Unless you've been living under a rock or in a cave, you would have noticed air fares across the world have been going up, up, and away.